Why It Was so Difficult to Introduce the New Theory of the Universal Law in the Past

Georgi Stankov, July 20, 2015

www.stankovuniversallaw.com

During the peak of my efforts to introduce the new theory of the Universal Law by submitting articles to peer international scientific journals in the late 90s and early 2000s, I realized how all these journals are possessed and manipulated by a handful of monopolistic Orion corporations and why as an individual one has no chance to win this battle with the ruling Reptilian dinosaurs. I came to the conclusion that this can be done only through a divine intervention and stopped investing energy in such futile attempts to search a resolution in a direct confrontation with the institutionalized scientific business on this planet, where blank, empty glances of the zombie-scientists are the only reaction to a new revolutionary idea and the natural pristine curiosity of humans to understand how nature puts the pieces together is non-existent among these brain-amputated representatives of the scientific empirical dogma.

Since then I transcended my activities by developing the new Gnosis of the Universal Law and began with the most intensive phase of the LBP as I realized that this is the only means with which the ascension of myself, Gaia and humanity can be achieved. This latter truth has not been understood by most light workers to this very day: without the LBP with all its pains, symptoms and social deprivations no individual ascension is possible. And if someone wants to sell you “crystal cubes of ascension from Atlantis” that Adama, the high priest of Telos and Agartha, has allegedly recommended for a lot of money, this only means that he has entered the club of the charlatans. It is so easy to go astray these days.

In July 2000 I had already ascended and my frequencies and vibrations were off the scale, but had to return to this reality in order to pave the way for the light warriors of the first and last hour to follow in my footsteps and to form the most powerful group of incarnated souls on this planet – The Planetary Ascension Team, the PAT. The rest is history as comprehensively documented on this website (see also the eight volumes on the Journey of the Planetary Ascension Team compiled by Erik Westhovens).

If you now ask why it was impossible to convince the scientists in the impeccable validity of the New General Theory of Science of the Universal Law, please consider that not only the MSM are in the dirty hands of a few Reptilian moguls, but first and foremost all scientific journals and other outlets. After all, as long as humans use language for their communication you need written scientific journals to promote your new revolutionary ideas in the field of science.

And as the Germans say: “printed paper is patient”. A zombie-scientist may discard the theory of the Universal Law in an oral conversation that does not leave any record, but it is impossible to discard this theory as presented in the four volumes of the Tetralogy of Science, as the arguments against the Law must be fixed and well-documented and can be easily rejected by myself in a written form. That is why nobody has ever dared to challenge this theory in a written form and the few forlorn New Agers who dared to question the validity of the Universal Law ended up in a cul-de-sac, alone with their prejudices that speak volumes about the (lack of) quality of their characters.

I am now talking about some notable efforts in the past by selected groups of New Agers to understand and hopefully reject the new theory of the Universal Law that only ended up in utter silence, in the full acknowledgment that they do not understand anything and are fully overwhelmed by the high level of abstraction and complexity of the new General Theory of Science.

I am pointing at these facts here as very soon they will play again a central role in the global discussion when we shall present the Universal law to humanity in Geneva in the course of this year. Everything I have said so far is still relevant and actual and only because you have waited for so long for this breakthrough to happen, does not mean that my words have lost their validity or that nothing will come out of them. Nothing is further from the truth.

I am stressing this circumstance at this point in time as I am very telepathic and sense, much to my chagrin, that some PAT members have lost their hope and faith in the Universal law and its transforming power over humanity and only read my website out of habit, in the absence of a better alternative. Nothing can be hidden now – not a single thought. Just in case you do not know where you stand in the current End Time.

Now back to the censorship in scientific communications. Given the fact that in the 90s there were approximately 40,000 scientific journals worldwide and half of them could be read in the Munich State Library, which I regularly visited at that time, it is remarkable to know that most of these journals are possessed by six giant corporations and that the rest of the scientific journals that were responsible for the diversity in opinions in science have long been closed due to lack of money.

The whole monkey business of science has become completely sterile and dogmatic and the only possibility to eradicate it is by pulverizing it from within and without. This is what we shall achieve when we ascend and appear as Logos Gods in front of humanity in the course of this year. This is the nuclear explosion we need to wipe out this sclerotic structure of failed present-day science.

In the following, I will publish an article from Natural News that confirms what I have known for more than 20 years – the scientific press is completely manipulated by the dark elite and its only purpose is to suppress all revolutionary ideas, such as the existence of free photon energy that will jeopardize the monopoly of the ruling cabal over the natural resources of this planet. Then without this monopoly there will be no NWO. Here we come again to the same insane plan that has determined the destiny of this humanity especially in the last century until now, as this is also the time when true science emerged at the historical stage and shaped significantly this “post-modern” society.

_________________________________

Academic Oligarchy: Majority of Science Publishing is Controlled by Just Six Companies

by Ethan A. Huff, July 19, 2015

Natural News

The flow of science in this modern age is largely controlled by just six corporate publishing groups, which by calculated design have been gobbling up the journal market since at least the 1970s. And a new study out of Canada reveals that this mass consolidation of publishing power is, to a large extent, skewing what passes as scientific progress.

Researchers from the University of Montreal poured through the whole of scientific literature published between 1973 and 2013 and found that the publishing realm has changed dramatically during this time. Many smaller publishers have been absorbed into larger ones, for instance, and academic research groups have become increasingly beholden to the interests of these major publishers, which tend to favor large industries like pharmaceuticals and vaccines.

Much of the independence that was once cherished within the scientific community, in other words, has gone by the wayside as these major publishers have taken control and now dictate what types of content get published. The result is a publishing oligopoly in which scientists are muzzled by an overarching trend toward politically correct, and industry-favoring, “science.”

“Overall, the major publishers control more than half of the market of scientific papers both in the natural and medical sciences and in the social sciences and humanities,” said Professor Vincent Lariviere, lead author of the study from the University of Montreal’s School of Library and Information Science.

“Furthermore, these large commercial publishers have huge sales, with profit margins of nearly 40%. While it is true that publishers have historically played a vital role in the dissemination of scientific knowledge in the print era, it is questionable whether they are still necessary in today’s digital era.”

The following Natural News infographic illustrates the disturbing reach of this academic oligarchy:

Six major publishers control fields of chemistry, psychology and social sciences

The fields most controlled by this academic oligarchy include those dealing with chemistry, psychology, social sciences and the professional fields. On the flip side, biomedical research, physics, and the arts and humanities are influenced to a much lesser degree by these six corporate publishers, according to the study.

What this suggests is that, over time, certain disciplines have become more corrupted than others as they’ve been absorbed into the corporate publishing fold. Such content, though often skewed, is highly profitable for publishers which not only don’t have to pay for the articles they publish but also resell such content digitally at profit margins upwards of 40%.

“As long as publishing in high impact factor journals is a requirement for researchers to obtain positions, research funding, and recognition from peers, the major commercial publishers will maintain their hold on the academic publishing system,” added Lariviere.

Publishing in one of “Big Six” corporate journals doesn’t add value, study finds

But does publishing in high-impact journals really make much of a difference in terms of article exposure and the quantity of citations? Not really, the researchers found. The reach is roughly the same, they found, except that smaller publishers are less likely to be actively promoting a special interest agenda, and are thus less likely censor science that doesn’t correspond with the official narrative.

“One would expect that a major publisher acquiring a journal would have the effect of increasing the latter’s visibility,” said Lariviere. “However, our study shows that there is no clear increase in terms of citations after switching from a small to large publisher.”

“Our findings question the real added value of big publishers. Ultimately, the question is whether the services provided to the scientific community by these publishers warrant the growing share of university budgets allocated to them.”

Basic sources for this article include:

http://www.nouvelles.umontreal.ca

http://journals.plos.org

This entry was posted in Ascension. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.