Georgi Alexandrov Stankov, January 22, 2020
From the article “Big Bang theory wrong? Star older than Universe discovered – threat of ‘scientific crisis’”; see also child-mother paradox.
“The theory of the Big Bang is just marketing”
with the leading German journal DER SPIEGEL
In the previous article I have proved in a comprehensive manner why modern cosmology is an entirely false categorical system of human scientific knowledge. It is the most recent physical discipline in the history of human science and emerged as an independent discipline less than a century ago. Since it initially evolved from physics, precisely from the general theory of relativity, while dealing with the rapidly accumulating experimental data coming from astronomy, it includes all the theoretical and epistemological blunders which these sciences had adopted in the past.
Most of the theoretical blunders that vitiate present-day cosmology stem from physics as astronomy has failed up to the present day to establish a rigid theoretical system with which to structure its most heterogeneous data and thus accepts uncritically and without any reflection the mathematical models that cosmology has imposed on it. The reason for that is that most astronomers are poor mathematicians and do not understand the enormous complexity of the current established cosmological models, such as the inflation theory. At the same time most cosmologists are mere mathematicians and have a very poor knowledge on physics, so that they have no idea on what real physical phenomena they apply their pure mathematical models.
There is such a profound disconnect between the unyielding mathematical efforts of present-day cosmologists and what is considered acceptable in physics nowadays that it is impossible for me to understand how it was possible that such weird hypotheses as the inflation hypothesis could gain such a popularity and acceptance among scientists even when their sciences can be rightly defined as “fake science“. I have already discussed this troublesome theoretical deficiency of modern cosmology with respect to the recently published doctor thesis of David Hawking
which created an immense hype in the mass media, however, without any critical assessment of his actual scientific achievements, which are none.
It is very important to discuss this topic at the beginning of this article as most people and even scientists cannot discern between astronomy and astrophysics as explorative, applied sciences and cosmology, which is an entirely theoretical mathematical discipline and has actually little to do with these disciplines except to consider some of their findings as black holes, neutron stars, various forms of radiation, such as the cosmic background radiation, etc. That is why when I discard cosmology as science in toto in this and previous articles, I do not consider astronomy, although it also brings very little knowledge on the true reality of All-That-Is.
In fact, this entirely optical discipline significantly contributes to the profound gnostic confusion of mankind with regard to our true origin as cosmic multidimensional beings of enormous creativity. The reason for that is the basic gnostic truth that human senses are the chief source of all human illusion in this 3D holographic model and that humans are essentially “eye-animals”, as I call them: They acquire almost 90% of their external information as optical perceptions. In this sense astronomy is an “eye discipline”, even, or rather especially, when one uses most sophisticated telescopes, and contributes immensely to human illusion as a cosmological worldview.
The central piece of present-day cosmology is the “big bang” hypothesis, also known as hot expanding hypothesis as laid out in the standard model of cosmology. It assumes that the universe, as observed today, has evolved from a state of homogeneous energy with a negligible space and incredible density which exploded in a small fraction of a second. This initial state of the universe is described as the “big bang“. Since then, the visible universe – please, recall that cosmologists can only perceive the visible universe as I have proved in my previous article – is believed to have been expanding incessantly. For further information on the “big bang” hypothesis and how this bogus idea was introduced historically in science read also this article:
In the context of this cosmological outlook, Hubble’s law is interpreted as a “law of expansion“. As this law is an application of the universal equation, we must reject this cosmological interpretation on axiomatic grounds. I have shown that Hubble’s law assesses the constant space-time of the visible universe. The two natural constants that are derived from this law, the radius of the visible universe RU and Hubble time assessing the age of the expanding universe 1/ Ho = AU = 1/fvis, give the constant space and time of the visible universe and confirm this conclusion. In this way I eliminate the first basic pillar of the standard model – the interpretation of Hubble’s law as a law of universal expansion.
We shall now present additional proofs for this irrefutable conclusion. The idea of the expanding universe is a consequence of the faulty idea of homogeneous space-time in the theory of relativity. I have shown in the new physical and mathematical theory of the Universal Law (volume I and volume II) that Einstein had not completely corrected the empty Euclidean space of classical mechanics, but had only introduced the reciprocity of space and time for the systems of matter.
Einstein regarded the gravitational objects as embedded in empty and “massless” photon space-time defined as vacuum, which is an absolutely wrong idea.
With respect to the reciprocity of space and time, Einstein assumed in the general theory of relativity that vacuum could be curved or bent by local gravitation. The current interpretation is that the path of light is attracted by local gravitational potentials and for this reason cannot be a straight line in space.
When this space-time concept is applied to cosmology, it inevitably leads to the neglect of the finite lifetimes of stars, as they have been described by Chandrasekhar and have been only later verified in modern astrophysics. The finite lifetime of any gravitational system is a consequence of the energy exchange between matter and photon space-time (see previous article).
The new Axiomatics clearly states that all systems, being superimposed rotations, have a finite lifetime which is only determined by the conditions of constructive and destructive interference. During this vertical energy exchange, the space-time of the material levels, such as atomic level, electron level, thermodynamic level etc., is transformed into the space-time of the photon level and vice versa.
Photons have a much greater space than that of the particles of material levels, as can be demonstrated by the [1d-space]-quantities of their elementary action potentials: the Compton wavelengths of the electron, λc,e=2.4×10-12 m, the proton, λc,pr=1.32×10-15 m, and the neutron, λc,n=1.32 ×10-15 m are much smaller than the wavelength of the elementary action potential h of the photon level, λA = 3×108 m, or more precisely, in the order of their intrinsic time – the specific Compton frequencies as Table 1 demonstrates:
The [1d-space]-quantity of the elementary action potential is a specific constant of the corresponding level. It assesses the specific space of the level. During vertical energy exchange between two levels, the expansion of space-time changes discretely in specific constant quantitative leaps. These leaps can be assessed by building space and time relationships between the levels (the universal equation as a rule of three). Such constants are dimensionless numbers. In the new Axiomatics, I call them “absolute constants of vertical energy exchange“ (see Volume II, chapter 9.9).
When we observe vertical energy exchange only in one direction, for instance, from matter to photon space-time, this process is perceived as an explosive expansion of space-time. This is precisely the current cosmological view.
The thermonuclear explosion is a typical, albeit more trivial, example of an energy exchange from the nuclear level towards the photon level also defined as radiation. This process is associated with an extreme space expansion described as “nuclear explosion“. The reason for this is the extremely small space of the hadrons compared to the expansion of the emitted photons during nuclear explosion, as has been demonstrated by the corresponding time magnitudes of these systems of space-time – the Compton frequencies or alternative by their intrinsic space constants – the Compton wavelengths (see Table 1 above).
When this vertical energy exchange is observed in the direction from photon space-time to matter, it manifests itself as a contraction of space. Black holes are a typical example of extreme space contraction and for that reason they are circumscribed as “space singularities“. Initially, black holes were believed to only “devour“ space and matter. However, this would be a violation of the law of energy conservation (1st law of thermodynamics).
Later on, it has been proven (only within mathematics because black holes cannot be directly observed) that black holes emit gamma radiation at their event horizon and thus obey the axiom of conservation of action potentials (see Axiomatics), just like all other systems of space-time. This has eliminated the spectacular character of these celestial bodies. For this reason the Russian term for black holes “frozen stars” is more appropriate.
The mean frequency of gamma radiation of black holes fH can be presented as a function of the intrinsic time f of the elementary particles of matter:
mp fH = mp ( fc,e + fpr,e + fn,e ) /3
The high temperature of black holes is another quantity of material time – the time of the thermodynamic level of matter. In Volume II, chapter 5.5, I have derived the new fundamental CBR-constant KCBR and have shown that the frequency of the maximal emitted radiation depends only on the temperature of the material body:
fmax = KCBR × T ( see Vol II, equation (82)).
In the previous publication I have used this constant to reject the second pillar of the standard model – the traditional interpretation of the 3K-cosmic background radiation (CBR).
The 3K-CBR is believed to be a remnant of the hot radiation of the big bang, which has resulted from the subsequent adiabatic expansion of the universe. This view is presented in the standard model of cosmology and is closely associated with the erroneous interpretation of redshifts by Hubble’s law as discussed in the previous publication.
From this elaboration, we conclude:
When the vertical energy exchange is observed only one way, that is, from matter to photon space-time, it gives the impression of space expansion. When the energy exchange is considered unilaterally from photon space-time to matter, it gives the impression of space contraction. When both directions are taken into consideration, the total change of space-time measured as ΔVU (VU stands for the volume of the universe) is zero:
ΔVU = 0, or VU = constant.
Space-time remains constant.
This is an axiomatic statement of the new theory. It could have been easily deduced from the conventional law of conservation of energy because energy can only be perceived as space-time by humans and scientists alike (see the principle of equivalence of the Primary Term in the new Axiomatics), as this illusory perception of human senses is independent of the sophistication of the applied instruments. Indeed, humanity should have been spared this intellectual insanity that fraudulent, stupid or unethical scientists have offered us as fake cosmology.
In present-day cosmology, photon space-time is regarded as a homogeneous empty void. For that reason this discipline considers the vertical energy exchange between matter and photon space-time only one way: from matter, which can be observed, to empty space, which allegedly has no structure because it cannot be directly perceived by human senses, although it is obvious in physics today that all elementary particles are spontaneously created from the “energy-rich” vacuum (void), which is a classical oxymoron and the greatest idio(cy) of all. This one-sided anthropocentric view – human beings are part of matter – which is a product of their limited senses and linearly thinking carbon-based brain, automatically evokes the misleading impression that the universe expands in the void.
As the finite lifetimes of stars are not considered in this outlook, modern cosmology has no adequate idea of the discrete, ubiquitous energy exchange between matter and photon space-time, unlike in the new Axiomatics. In Volume II, chapter 3.7, I have proved that when the axiom of reciprocal LRC is applied to the visible universe, this system of space-time can be described as a function of the LRC of the photon level and the gravitational level.
The space of the visible universe given as SU , which is the circumference [1d-space] of the event horizon KS as the spherical surface [2d-space] of the visible universe (see equation (241) in Volume II) is proportional to the LRC (universal photon gradient) of the photon level LRCp = UU = c2, which stands for space expansion, and is inversely proportional to the LRC of gravitation as expressed by the gravitational constant G (which is field or acceleration per definition) that stands for the contraction of space as gravitation is a force of attraction (see equation (37a), Volume II):
SU = c2 /G
This beautiful, simple equation is an application of the Universal Equation as a rule of three. It embodies the entire space-time behaviour of the visible universe according to the axiom of reducibility and exposes current cosmology as absolutely “fake science”. It proves that its circumference SU which describes the event horizon of the visible universe is a constant [1d-space]-quantity because it is a quotient of two natural constants, c and G, assessing the two levels of vertical energy exchange – photon space-time and gravitation for matter.
It is indeed amazing how it is possible that so much information which encompasses the entire theory of modern cosmology can be condensed into such a simple equation, which is a rule of three and thus the simplest equation in human mathematics. This is the virtue of the new theory of the Universal Law. It shows us that:
- Simplicity is beautiful.
- Simplicity is pure knowledge.
- Simplicity is the utmost form of aesthetics.
- Simplicity is freedom of Spirit from the shackles of matter.
For obvious reasons, cosmology, actually astronomy, can only assess the space-time of the visible universe and is not in a position to obtain any experimental evidence beyond its event horizon (see previous article). This is the privilege of the new Axiomatics of the Universal Law – it assesses the primary term of All-That-Is epistemologically and not empirically (priority of axiomatization over empiricism).
As we see, the new Axiomatics affects an incredible simplification in our cosmological worldview and rejects the idea of an expanding universe as a false unilateral perception of the energy exchange between matter and photon space-time. This idea has given birth to many paradoxes, which are closely associated with the interpretation of the Doppler effect in the context of Hubble’s law (see previous article).
But first and foremost the rejection of photon space-time as a real level of All-That-Is and its substitution with empty space (vacuum) has prevented so far the development of new technologies based on free photon energy which will very soon bring unlimited abundance to the entire humanity. Therefore, all false (fake) scientific ideas have a huge negative impact on the evolution of humanity and cause a lot of suffering and pain to all the people. Science is not an ivory tower fully detached from human existence. It determines through its ideas human life in a profound manner. First comes the idea, then its materialisation, this is a fundamental gnostic truth that everybody should deeply internalize. For this reason, all false ideas in science should be abolished once and for all, at best in the course of this year of 2020, so that humanity can begin to enjoy freedom, abundance, creativity, and unlimited intellectual expansion. The Universal Law and its Theory of Science is the only vehicle to achieve this noble goal.